Riga Technical University

Faculty of Engineering Economics

Riga international airport

Riga 2004

|Contents |
|1 |1 291 |1 340 |1 299 |-3.1 |
|2 |1 349 |1 338 |1 290 |-3.6 |
|3 |1 516 |1 545 |1 572 |1.7 |
|4 |1 443 |1 493 |1 699 |13.8 |
|5 |1 744 |1 728 |1 680 |-2.8 |
|6 |1 600 |1 783 |1 654 |-7.2 |
|7 |1 464 |1 622 |1 694 |4.4 |
|8 |1 650 |1 839 |1 747 |-5.0 |
|9 |1 602 |1 694 |1 623 |-4.2 |
|10 |1 645 |1 682 |1 653 |-1.7 |
|11 |1 479 |1 540 |1 430 |-7.1 |
|12 |1 287 |1 306 |1 335 |2.2 |
|Total: |18 070 |18 910 |18 676 |-1.2 |

Table 1. Aircraft movements

Passenger figures exceed 600 000, i.e. by 1.7% more than in 2001 for the second consecutive year. Altogether, the airport handled 18 676 flights falling behind the previous report year by 1.2% due to “Austrian Airlines”,
“Estonian Air” and the Swedish airline “Trygg-Flyg” deceasing flights to
Riga.

For the third year air cargo transportation has grown considerably with turnover exceeding 6 000 tons for the first time, i.e. by 26.3% over the previous year. Cargo transportation import (78.2%) still significantly exceeds export (21.8%).

To achieve these results the airport staff had to be more purposeful, determined and competent than in the previous report period.

12 carriers including “Air Baltic”, “Aeroflot”, “Austrian Airlines”,
“Belavia”, “British Airways”, “?SA”, “Estonian Air”, “Finnair”, “Latpass
Airlines”, “LOT”, “Lufthansa” and “Trygg-Flyg” provided scheduled passenger flights from “Riga” airport in 2002.

Scheduled direct flights linked Riga with 16 European cities including
Berlin, Frankfurt, Helsinki, Jonkoping, Kiev, Copenhagen, London, Moscow,
Minsk, Prague, Stockholm, Tallinn, Tel Aviv, Warsaw, Vilnius and Vienna.
|Month |2000 |2001 |2002 |2002/2001(%) |
|1 |302 |346 |502 |45.1 |
|2 |323 |371 |473 |27.5 |
|3 |400 |449 |559 |24.5 |
|4 |346 |421 |561 |33.3 |
|5 |359 |485 |379 |-21.9 |
|6 |350 |446 |428 |-4.0 |
|7 |346 |429 |354 |-17.5 |
|8 |424 |438 |403 |-8.0 |
|9 |430 |395 |546 |38.2 |
|10 |507 |451 |685 |51.9 |
|11 |386 |529 |573 |8.3 |
|12 |485 |449 |1 117 |148.8 |
|Total |4 658 |5 209 |6 580 |26.3 |

Table 2. Cargo transportation (t)
Major passenger flows and routes of scheduled flights.

In 2002 the flight map changed slightly with “Air Baltic” exploring new destinations and starting flights to Berlin in May and later to Vienna.
Additionally, “Air Baltic” resumed flights to Moscow, Warsaw and Prague, which had been suspended as unprofitable the previous years. Thus, the
Latvian aviation market was considerably divided. “Air Baltic” improved its position, but “Austrian Airlines” discontinued flights from Vienna to Riga due to the imposed flight reduction. In comparison with the last year, the dynamics of passenger growth for the above destinations dropped considerably by 885 on the Warsaw route, 22.8% on the Vienna route and
17.3% on the Moscow route.
|Month |2000 |2001 |2002 |2002/2001(%) |
|1 |35 235 |38 681 |38 377 |-0.8 |
|2 |35 637 |38 243 |37 477 |-2.0 |
|3 |45 454 |46 510 |45 393 |-2.4 |
|4 |45 087 |48 154 |48 420 |0.6 |
|5 |54 308 |57 248 |55 802 |-2.5 |
|6 |56 017 |68 036 |63 980 |-6.0 |
|7 |53 123 |61 247 |62 114 |1.4 |
|8 |56 140 |67 041 |62 485 |-6.8 |
|9 |55 810 |60 879 |63 294 |4.0 |
|10 |51 645 |51 872 |61 270 |18.1 |
|11 |44 804 |43 924 |49 357 |12.4 |
|12 |41 096 |40 812 |45 353 |11.1 |
|Total |574 356 |622 647 |633 322 |1.7 |

Table 3. Passenger movements

In 2002 73 passengers out of every 100 handled in Riga (including transit) travelled to or from Western Europe. Altogether scheduled flights to Western Europe were responsible for the growth of passengers figures
(almost 11 000). Berlin, with the highest passengers growth rate ranks first among the cities of Western Europe (it should be mentioned, however, that in 2001 there were no scheduled flights on this route); followed by
London with 6.9% and Frankfurt with 6.4%. However, there is an exception.
For the first time passengers figures on the Helsinki route have dropped by almost 3 000 or 3.9% in comparison with the last year. Nevertheless,
Helsinki ranks 2 nd on the list of the most popular destinations. For the second successive year passenger figures on the Stockholm route have dropped sharply by almost 14 000 or 21%. Accordingly, a Stockholm rank 6th instead of the previous 3rd, but the Copenhagen has constantly been number one since 1996, despite a passenger growth rate, which has slowed down on the route.

In 2002 passenger figures for Eastern and Central Europe have grown slightly. Some destinations have faced radical changes. As in previous years, passengers figures decreased by 17.3% on the Moscow route. For the second year after resuming scheduled flights on the Tallinn route passenger figures went down by 11.4%. Passengers figures on the Prague route increased significantly by 27.7% for the second year. It should be underlined that the Prague route has the highest absolute growth rate, i.e. by 13 000 passengers more and even surpasses the Copenhagen route.
Accordingly, Prague shows a very convincing growth and ranks 3rd instead of being 6th in 2001 on the list of the most popular destinations. The success allowed “?SA” to pull ahead of such major airlines as “British Airways”,
“Lufthansa” and “Finnair”. A couple of years ago such a forecast would have seemed unbelievable. “?SA” passengers figures have almost tripled compared with 1999 and almost doubled compared with 2000.

Only three of the carriers providing scheduled flights to Riga during the report year have carried fewer passengers than in 2001, i.e. “Aeroflot” with 29.6%, “Finnair” with 16.3% and “LOT” with 2.7%. These airlines have reduced flight frequency by 35.8%, 2.4% and 1.7% respectively. “Air Baltic” has carried the majority of passengers to and from Riga, i.e. 43% of the total number of passengers. “?SA” with 10% of passengers handled at “Riga” airport ranks 2nd. As in 2001, “British Airways” with 9% ranks 3rd,
“Lufthansa” with 8% ranks 4th, “Finnair” with 8% is 5th, but “Latcharter” with 7% is 6th.
|City |2000 |2001 |2002 |2002/2001(%) |
|Copenhagen |137 895 |152 109 |152 109 |3.0 |
|Helsinki |65 670 |71 712 |71 712 |-3.9 |
|Prague |34 741 |50 084 |50 084 |27.7 |
|Frankfurt |51 669 |54 715 |54 715 |6.4 |
|London |50 115 |53 274 |53 274 |6.9 |
|Stockholm |71 145 |65 094 |65 094 |-21.0 |
|Moscow |44 194 |41 810 |41 810 |-17.3 |
|Warsaw |10 349 |19 687 |19 687 |1.7 |
|Vienna |20 404 |20 567 |20 567 |-22.8 |
|Kiev |11 087 |11 231 |11 231 |8.2 |
|Tallinn |14 066 |11 086 |11 086 |-11.4 |
|Mugla |2 778 |3 186 |3 186 |2.3x |
|Berlin | |391 |391 |18.0x |
|Vilnius |9 821 |6 680 |6 680 |-3.1 |
|Barcelona |3 514 |2 497 |2 497 |1.6x |
|Heraklion |2 232 |1 115 |1 115 |-3.1 |
|Others |36 374 |57 409 |56 294 | |
|Total |574 356 |622 647 |622 647 |1.7 |

Table 4. Passenger movements per city
Air cargo

In 2002 the handled cargo volume has increased by more than 1 300 tons when compared to the previous year. Riga International Airport has never faced such an important increase in cargo volume before.

Of all the carries providing scheduled flights, “?SA” achieved the highest growth of both cargo volume and passengers figures; while
“Aeroflot” had the highest rate of cargo volume. Contrary to passenger figures, cargo volume dropped by 20.9% for “British Airways” and by 10.5% for “Lufthansa” for the second year. Cargo volume also slightly decreased also for “Finnair”. Nevertheless, “Finnair” is the major air cargo carrier in Riga with 20% of the total cargo volume handled at the airport ((25% in
2001); followed by “Air Baltic” with 16% (21% in 2001); “SAS” with 15% (18% in 2002); “?SA” with 7% (6% in 2001); “Aeroflot” with 6% (5% in 2001);
“Lufthansa” with 5% (7% in 2001); and “British Airways” with 2% in 2001).
|Airline |2000 |2001 |2002 |2002/2001(%) |
|Finnair |934 |1 323 |1 308 |-1.1 |
|Air Baltic |1 041 |1 099 |1 045 |-4.9 |
|SAS |845 |952 |971 |2.0 |
|?SA |249 |305 |429 |40.7 |
|Aeroflot |209 |277 |394 |42.2 |
|Lufthansa |453 |389 |348 |-10.5 |
|British Airways |304 |191 |151 |-20.9 |
|Concors | |137 |145 |5.6 |
|Air Polonia | |7 |117 |16.7x |
|LOT |112 |112 |115 |2.7 |
|Austrian Airlines |36 |36 |23 |-36.0 |
|White Eagle |190 |101 | | |
|Aviation | | | | |
|Others |210 |280 |1 534 | |
|Total |4 658 |5 209 |6 580 |26.3 |

Table 5. Cargo transportation (t)

Modernization and extension of the airport

During the report year attention was paid to the reinforcement and technical upgrading of aviation security measures. “Riga” Airport investment in aviation security has always been balanced. In view of the
11th September terrorist attacks the airport carried out unscheduled activities to reinforce security, transferring a major part of the investment initially planned for infrastructure development to security.

In the middle of 2002 cargo X-ray equipment was obtained and installed. Latvia is a member of European Aviation Conference (ECAC), which set 1 January 2003 the deadline for the introduction of the 100% screening of checked baggage at international airports. If this requirement had not been met, the aircraft departing from Riga would have faced long handling delays at other European airports; while all the baggage arriving from
“Riga” airport would have been subject to time-consuming security controls.
At the end of 2002 “Riga” airport launched automatic baggage screening equipment- which is a part of the common baggage security control system- to provide maximum safety and convenience for passengers. The producer of the equipment is the well-known company ‘Heimann”. The system facilitates three-level baggage control. The automatic baggage screening equipment has the capacity to process 1 200 baggage units per hour. Accordingly, two systems facilitate security control of 2 400 baggage units per hour. The installed equipment ensures security control fully compliant with the EU requirements in the field of aviation security. In addition to baggage control equipment, a computer room was arranged and 47 airport employees were trained. Altogether, security equipment and the reconstruction of baggage conveyors cost the airport 1.6 million EUR.

To reinforce security in the major areas and facilities at the airport, the aircraft handling area and the technical area of the airfield was fenced off and a checkpoint was arranged.

Поделитесь этой записью или добавьте в закладки