Should press de liable or not english
Категория реферата: Топики по английскому языку
Теги реферата: вопросы и ответы, мировая экономика
Добавил(а) на сайт: Холодов.
Предыдущая страница реферата | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Следующая страница реферата
publication both invades her privacy and broke her safety. In cases
like this, it's not so easy to have confidence in market incentives.
The harm from the defect is highly concentrated on the single
defamed or exposed individual.
Now, it's time to ask the major question: Should the press be
permitted to externalize particularized harms? Why should not the
press, like other business entities, be liable when defects in its
products cause particularized harm to individual third parties who
have few means of self-protection at their disposal?
According to the Constitution, defamed public officials or rape
victims should have access to massmedia for rebuttal. As for
everyday practice, the press is not always eager to give space to
claims that it has erred. There are two objections, why the press
shouldn't be responsible for the harm of such kind: accountability
to a more demanding legal standard would compromise its financial
viability and undermine its independence.
These objections are too SELF-SERVING to be taken completely
seriously: The financial viability argument is no more persuasive
when the product of the press harms innocent third parties than it
is when other manufacturers' malfunctioning products harm
bystanders. As press doesn't underproduce information, thus
"freedom" from liability can't be defended as necessary subsidy. The
"financial viability" objection points toward the imposition of
liability for harm.
The need to maintain the press's independence from government
Рекомендуем скачать другие рефераты по теме: новшество, контрольные 2 класс, реферат по обществознанию.
Предыдущая страница реферата | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Следующая страница реферата