Should press de liable or not english
Категория реферата: Топики по английскому языку
Теги реферата: вопросы и ответы, мировая экономика
Добавил(а) на сайт: Холодов.
Предыдущая страница реферата | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Следующая страница реферата
liability for political information is seen as ANTIDEMOCRATIC. The
press is constitutionally obligated to check on the government.
Most of policymakers justify legal liability for harms, caused by
goods and services and quite limited liability for harms, caused by
information. Liability for defective consumer products is PREDICATED
on a market failure. As for "unfair" producers, power of possible
profits PREVENT consumers from translating their true preferences
for safety and quality into effective demand. So, customer
preferences remain outside the safety and quality decision-making
process of producers. Today, it'll be a new mechanism to force
producers to follow customers true preferences.
Lack of liability for defective or harmful political information
can be predicated only on a different kind of supposed market failure
- not a failure of the market to SUPPLY the LEVEL of safety that
customers want but its failure to supply the amount of political
information that society should have. Some experts say, that free
market has tendency to produce "too little" correct information,
especially political information.
The thing is: political information is a public good and it has
many characteristics of a public good. That is a product that many
people value and use but only few will pay for. Factual(real)
information cannot easily be restricted to direct purchasers. Many
people benefit who do not pay for it because the market cannot find
the way to charge them. As you can see, providers of political
information try to get as much profit as possible spreading it, so
Рекомендуем скачать другие рефераты по теме: новшество, контрольные 2 класс, реферат по обществознанию.
Предыдущая страница реферата | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Следующая страница реферата