Предыдущая страница реферата | 11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21 | Следующая страница реферата



Pl. cunnon cunnen cъюon cъюen юurfan (need)

Sg. 1 юearf юorfte

2 юearft } юurfe юorftest } юorfte

3 юearf юorfte

Pl. юurfon юurfen юorfton юorften magan (may)

Sg. 1 mжg meahte mihte, mihten

2 meaht } mжge meahtest

3 mжg meahte

Pl. magon mжgen meahton

The main difference of verbs of this type in modern English is their expressing modality, i.e. possibility, obligation, necessity. They do not require the particle to before the infinitive which follows them. In Old
English in general no verb requires this particle before the infinitive. In fact, this to before the infinitive form meant the preposition of direction.
And now finally a few irregular verbs, which used several different stems for their tenses. These verbs are very important in Old English and are met very often in the texts: wesan (to be), bйon (to be), gбn (to go), dуn (to do), willan (will). Mind that there was no Future tense in the Old English language, and the future action was expressed by the Present forms, just sometimes using verbs of modality, willan (lit. "to wish to do") or sculan
(lit. "to have to do"). wesan (to be) - has got only the Present tense forms, uses the verb bйon in the Past

Present

Ind. Subj. Imp.

Sg.1 eom -

2 eart } sнe, sэ wes

3 is -

Pl. sind sнen, sэn 2 wesaю bйon (to be)

Present

Ind. Subj. Imp.

Sg. 1 bйo -

2 bist }bйo bйo

3 biю -

Pl. bйoю bйon 2 bйoю

Past

Ind. Subj.

Sg. 1 wжs

Рекомендуем скачать другие рефераты по теме: инновационный менеджмент, план дипломной работы, банк курсовых работ бесплатно.

Предыдущая страница реферата | 11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21 | Следующая страница реферата

Поделитесь этой записью или добавьте в закладки